Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill (1922)

August 19, 2012 
/ Contributed By: Steven J. Jager

|

|

Public domain image|

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill (hereinafter “Dyer Bill”) refers to a 1922 Congressional effort to pass federal legislation to address and otherwise provide federal prosecution of nationwide lynchings, particularly those in the southern states.  The bill was first introduced by Missouri Congressman Leonidas C. Dyer in 1918.

The Dyer Bill defined lynching as follows: “The phrase ‘mob or riotous assemblage,’ when used in this act, shall mean an assemblage composed of three or more acting in concert for the purpose of depriving any person of his life without the authority of law as a punishment for or to prevent the commission of some actual or supposed public offense.”

The legislation addressed lynching in three interrelated parts.  First, the act punished state and municipal officers who failed to do their duty in protecting the lives of persons from mobs.  Second, the act punished the perpetrators of the crime of lynching by federal prosecution.  Third, the act compelled the county where the crime was committed to make compensation, by forfeiture of $10,000 to the family, or if no family, to dependent parents, and if none, to the United States.

The constitutional validity for proposed legislation was found in the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.  Because lynching was considered a private act outside the law, the proponents argued that state officials’ failure to uphold their sworn duties denied victims “equal protection of the laws” under the Fourteenth Amendment.

The opponents articulated arguments based on the historic relationship of state, local, and federal authority.  They cited the traditional role of local authorities to retain jurisdiction to enforce state criminal statutes and opposed federal intrusion into this area.  They did not address proponents’ arguments that local authorities, in allowing lynching, had abdicated their constitutional enforcement duties.

Federal efforts to enact anti-lynching legislation date to at least 1901. During that period and for much of the first half of the 20th Century Southern Democrats in Congress maintained a solid front against the Dyer Bill each time it reached the floor of the House.

The Dyer Bill was ultimately defeated by a Southern Democratic filibuster in December 1922 and twice more thereafter. Despite having the passage of an anti-lynching bill in their 1920 platform, the Republicans, who were the primary sponsors of the legislation, were unable to pass a bill in the 1920s.

Author Profile

Steven J. Jager is a Seattle based attorney and founding partner of Jager Law Office PLLC who practices in Washington, Alaska and Oregon. He lectures frequently and is a past board member of the Washington Defense Trial Lawyers. Mr. Jager graduated with a Bachelors of Arts in Economics degree from Seattle University in 1977, and received his Juris Doctor degree from Gonzaga University in 1980, and is presently enrolled in a part time capacity at the University of Washington, pursuing a degree program in History. Mr. Jager currently, or has served on the boards for the following Seattle based educational institutions: St. Joseph’s Elementary School (as chair), Holy Names High School, Seattle University Department of Economics Board of Advisors and the Gonzaga Law School Board of Advisors. The father of three educated adult daughters, and a lifelong voracious reader, Mr. Jager has traveled widely throughout the world and to all 50 United States.

CITE THIS ENTRY IN APA FORMAT:

Jager, S. (2012, August 19). Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill (1922). BlackPast.org. https://new.blackpast.org/african-american-history/dyer-anti-lynching-bill-1922/

Source of the Author's Information:

The History of Anti-Lynching Legislation in Congress, The Congressional Digest, Public Conduct Legislation, March, 1922, as photocopied and accessed from http://www.oldmagazinearticles.com/; William B. Hixson, Jr., “Moorfield Storey and the Defense of the Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill”, The New England Quarterly, Vol. 42, No.1 (March 1969), 65-81, accessed at https://www.jstor.org/stable/363500.

Further Reading